Over the summer I was debating about whether to get involved in the Diaspora project ... I mean, we really need a privacy-friendly Facebook alternative, and without any disrespect to Appleseed and OneSocialWeb, it seems to me that because of their visibility and a great name, Diaspora currently has the best chance to get to critical mass.
My initial reaction was a big red flag from a diversity perspective: the "Diaspora 4" are all white guys from the same school. Then again they're hanging out at Pivotal Labs in San Francisco -- home of Sarah Mei, who's done such great work getting women involved in the San Francisco Ruby community -- so I decided not to rush to any conclusions.
When Diaspora's first release revealed a lack of security thinking, I realized this was a place I could potentially help. I sent some initial ideas to their developer mailing list ... and Sarah replied in great detail with some very helpful feedback. Then there was a real stroke of luck: I happened to send the next draft to a friend at the exact time that she ran into one of the Diaspora guys in a bar in SF. Not sure of the details, but my friend wound up volunteering to help Diaspora with threat modeling. How cool is that? This afternoon I'm giving a talk to several hundred people and will similarly be encouraging them to get involved.
Of course security isn't the only thing I'm interested in. So when I saw cvharquail's outstanding If Women Had Designed Facebook I sent it to the Diaspora discussion list to see how people would react. The discussion was somewhat narrow, not really addressing the bigger picture, but there were some decent replies weighing the pros and cons of customizing profiles and how best to go about it.
And then a couple days ago somebody weighed in with this:
What a maroon.
I mean, let's just tick off a few of the ways this is a bad idea.
And sure enough, in a comment on cv's thread, Hannah said
Yeah really. Sigh.
Oh well. Looking at it more positively, it's an interesting test for the Diaspora team -- who quite probably has never had to deal with a situation like this before where they're the ones in power and setting the tone for the project.
Diversity best practices are to visibly step in and say something along the lines of "that's not how we do things here -- it's fine to disagree about whether or not this is important, but avoid the personal attacks." And it would be even better if they go further: explicitly say that they want to involve women both in the project and as users and talk about what they're doing on that front, and perhaps even express interest in applying some of cv's perspectives and learning about Gender HCI and Feminist HCI. Maybe I'll send them cv's followup post Designing for Feminists vs. Designing for Women: Different vs. Revolutionary to see how people react.
As for the troll, stop me if you've heard this before but ...
What a maroon.
PS: for more on Facebook's all-blue UI and Zuckerberg's color-blindness, see Anil Dash's The Facebook Reckoning and my comment.
My initial reaction was a big red flag from a diversity perspective: the "Diaspora 4" are all white guys from the same school. Then again they're hanging out at Pivotal Labs in San Francisco -- home of Sarah Mei, who's done such great work getting women involved in the San Francisco Ruby community -- so I decided not to rush to any conclusions.
When Diaspora's first release revealed a lack of security thinking, I realized this was a place I could potentially help. I sent some initial ideas to their developer mailing list ... and Sarah replied in great detail with some very helpful feedback. Then there was a real stroke of luck: I happened to send the next draft to a friend at the exact time that she ran into one of the Diaspora guys in a bar in SF. Not sure of the details, but my friend wound up volunteering to help Diaspora with threat modeling. How cool is that? This afternoon I'm giving a talk to several hundred people and will similarly be encouraging them to get involved.
Of course security isn't the only thing I'm interested in. So when I saw cvharquail's outstanding If Women Had Designed Facebook I sent it to the Diaspora discussion list to see how people would react. The discussion was somewhat narrow, not really addressing the bigger picture, but there were some decent replies weighing the pros and cons of customizing profiles and how best to go about it.
And then a couple days ago somebody weighed in with this:
I'm surprised that all of you missed the glaring, well-known public
fact of Mark Zuckerberg being red-green colorblind (an X-linked trait),
so the blue theme was the only one he could actually see rendered
the way unaffected viewers see it. Period.
The arrogant feminist crank "scholar" who wrote the original article
that spawned this thread, of course, couldn't be bothered to see
past her own delusional fantasies about the way the world works.
What a maroon.
I mean, let's just tick off a few of the ways this is a bad idea.
- it's flipping off somebody (me) who's showing up and helping the project
- it's passing up a chance to enlist somebody extremely respected and influential (cv)
- it's ignoring the huge opportunity for Diaspora and any of the other Facebook competitors: women are the majority of Facebook users, they've got a track record of privacy invasions, and a movie just came out portraying their CEO as a sexist asshole
- it's likely to drive away women -- and guys who don't want to be in environments where this kind of behavior goes on
And sure enough, in a comment on cv's thread, Hannah said
I was kind of depressed to see the response when it was posted on the Diaspora discussion boards...
Yeah really. Sigh.
Oh well. Looking at it more positively, it's an interesting test for the Diaspora team -- who quite probably has never had to deal with a situation like this before where they're the ones in power and setting the tone for the project.
Diversity best practices are to visibly step in and say something along the lines of "that's not how we do things here -- it's fine to disagree about whether or not this is important, but avoid the personal attacks." And it would be even better if they go further: explicitly say that they want to involve women both in the project and as users and talk about what they're doing on that front, and perhaps even express interest in applying some of cv's perspectives and learning about Gender HCI and Feminist HCI. Maybe I'll send them cv's followup post Designing for Feminists vs. Designing for Women: Different vs. Revolutionary to see how people react.
As for the troll, stop me if you've heard this before but ...
What a maroon.
PS: for more on Facebook's all-blue UI and Zuckerberg's color-blindness, see Anil Dash's The Facebook Reckoning and my comment.
A good response
Date: 2010-10-16 02:31 pm (UTC)From:We exchanged some email afterwards, and he invited me to please stick around. Guess I will :-)
dCKkbWoqZINlNa
Date: 2012-03-17 05:36 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)euwnGIVgGbsOqbNcw
Date: 2012-06-10 04:09 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)BXisPvxZizZ
Date: 2012-08-22 09:37 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)mIWtPOghtq
Date: 2012-11-09 06:27 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)CTtwhGBstfyEcTq
Date: 2013-02-06 05:13 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)OktQKVSrbROwFWwCTT
Date: 2013-02-06 08:53 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)WhPTypYyrSra
Date: 2012-08-25 07:19 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)gJZeDNzHDslgT
Date: 2012-11-09 08:56 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)The troll responds ...
Date: 2010-10-17 07:31 pm (UTC)From:Sometimes all you can say is ...
:-)
WwxMzpEKqapx
Date: 2012-03-14 07:15 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)JonfZEwByMRf
Date: 2012-06-09 03:11 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)gkVTKZyrGj
Date: 2012-08-22 11:53 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)tycllrXvIEvySWyHflX
Date: 2012-08-25 04:54 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)gvVmBQLWPS
Date: 2012-11-09 06:00 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)zimAINFZrmHnqliqu
Date: 2013-02-06 09:10 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)gRMRXSjEsiM
Date: 2012-08-25 07:37 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)yoVMfRLLzpjjzy
Date: 2012-11-07 12:14 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)pgmQhIXCCeUgTC
Date: 2012-11-09 05:51 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)DtGLmEgIQNvHEajeJNg
Date: 2012-06-12 04:55 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)VRoAnbMDqQqjiSQtT
Date: 2012-08-23 12:06 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)ZNBCRAMZqk
Date: 2012-11-07 09:23 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)PdJUcjkANuw
Date: 2012-11-08 12:12 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)wdkZbFDJRgrIZbVL
Date: 2012-08-23 12:55 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)UOEPxUbuAwIUtL
Date: 2012-06-12 07:45 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)WYQXMjkeJXqzHTRUWZF
Date: 2012-08-25 03:59 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)mRhzeiHfQPbMoz
Date: 2012-03-17 08:24 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)JoSmvLfvPsAUqtyiGB
Date: 2012-06-09 05:28 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)ZbpcgaUCgafcHx
Date: 2012-08-23 10:03 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)kflTGdhYCRcEaTg
Date: 2012-11-09 06:13 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)NWTwNcVmmffYdZaHju
Date: 2012-11-09 06:22 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)iEbOcXvOZpxDm
Date: 2013-02-06 01:00 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)LgnUrrImcrPHnhYagMX
Date: 2013-02-06 05:46 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)WFIveLtGFXS
Date: 2012-11-09 07:47 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)dQApxjIOyOQn
Date: 2012-08-23 05:17 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)no subject
Date: 2013-03-03 05:35 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)Интернет-магазин Health and Beaute
Date: 2013-07-05 04:59 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)